“Was Not Christ Crucified?” — The Spirit of Nat Turner Still Walks With Us

B1Clothing Co. | Honoring Black American Freedmen History

“He hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives…” — Luke 4:18

Introduction: The Echo of a Prophet’s Cry

The profound question, “Was not Christ crucified?”, attributed to Nat Turner just days before his execution, serves as a powerful and defiant statement. It encapsulates his unyielding conviction and the deep religious justification he found for his actions. This question establishes the central theme of religious conviction as a driving force, framing Turner’s narrative as one of righteous, even messianic, sacrifice.

Nat Turner, an enslaved preacher and self-styled prophet, orchestrated the deadliest slave revolt in U.S. history, which unfolded in Southampton County, Virginia, in August 1831. His rebellion was far from a spontaneous act of violence; it was a deeply spiritual and strategically planned uprising rooted in prophetic visions. These visions challenged the institution of slavery and sent shockwaves across the nation. The rebellion’s cultural and legal aftermath altered the political landscape and demonstrated how resistance, even when suppressed, can profoundly shift societal dynamics.

A Divine Mandate: Nat Turner’s Visions and Faith

Born on October 2, 1800, in Southampton County, Virginia, Turner was unusually literate for an enslaved person, having learned to read and write. From a young age, he displayed deep religiosity and an uncanny ability to recount events that occurred before his birth, which some interpreted as prophetic. He became a preacher within the enslaved community, dedicating his time to reading the Bible, praying, and fasting.

Turner claimed to receive direct messages from God through visions and signs in nature. In 1825, he envisioned an impending bloody conflict between Black and white people. In 1828, he interpreted another vision as a divine order to prepare for an uprising. A solar eclipse on February 12, 1831, was a critical sign for him to begin sharing the idea of revolt. A subsequent event in August 1831, where the sun appeared silver and then green, confirmed the urgency of their mission.

These celestial signs, interpreted through a prophetic lens, validated Turner’s belief that he was chosen by God to violently liberate his people. Turner’s faith was so absolute that he once returned to his master after an escape attempt, believing it was God’s will. This juxtaposition between Turner’s interpretation of Christianity and the version used by slaveholders highlights how enslaved people reimagined scripture as a radical source of liberation.

The Southampton Insurrection: A Brief, Bloody Uprising

The insurrection was meticulously planned. Turner initially shared his idea with four trusted men: Henry, Hark,

Nelson, and Sam. They prioritized secrecy, avoided stockpiling weapons, and postponed their initial July 4 launch due to uncertainty. The strategy was simple yet brutal: kill white men, women, and children to inspire mass rebellion. Once a “sufficient force” was gathered, conventional warfare would commence.

The uprising began on Sunday night, August 21, 1831, at the Joseph Travis farm. Turner’s group, initially about a dozen men, moved with stealth, killing the sleeping family and gathering support as they progressed. By dawn on August 22, they split into two squads for greater impact. At Elizabeth Turner’s farm, they used a gun for the first time. Turner personally killed only one person—Margaret Whitehead. The force grew to approximately 40–75 enslaved people but struggled to gain mass support.

Their ultimate aim was to seize the county seat of Jerusalem and acquire arms from the local armory. However, a white militia ambushed them outside the town. By midday on August 23, the revolt was crushed. Turner evaded capture until October 30, 1831. Despite its limited duration, the rebellion deeply unsettled the South, demonstrating the high stakes and near-impossibility of large-scale revolts under American slavery.

“Was Not Christ Crucified?”: Conviction in the Face of Death

After his capture, Turner was jailed and dictated his story to court-appointed attorney Thomas R. Gray. Their exchange, published as The Confessions of Nat Turner, contains Turner’s famous retort to Gray’s question about whether he regretted the rebellion: “Was not Christ crucified?”

The statement connects Turner’s imminent execution to Jesus’s crucifixion, framing his rebellion as divinely sanctioned martyrdom. Turner’s unshakable belief that his actions were ordained by God gave him strength and resolve. He viewed suffering not as failure, but as fulfillment of prophecy.

Even Gray noted Turner’s intelligence and conviction, portraying him as more than a simple fanatic. However, Gray’s motivations and editing choices have sparked ongoing debates over the confession’s authenticity. While some argue it reflects Gray’s biases, most modern scholars, including Eric Sundquist and Christopher Tomlins, accept it as largely authentic, acknowledging Turner’s prophetic voice.

The Ritual Desecration of Nat Turner: A White Supremacist Spectacle

After Turner’s execution by hanging on November 11, 1831, white supremacists carried out one of the most brutal acts of desecration recorded in American history. His body was handed over to physicians, then flayed, dissected, quartered, and mutilated beyond recognition. Eyewitnesses and local accounts described how Turner’s skin was tanned into leather and used to make items like coin purses, his flesh rendered into grease, and his bones distributed as souvenirs.

Black historian John W. Cromwell documented how, decades later, white Virginians still boasted of owning Turner’s remains. William S. Drewry, a white historian, confirmed these atrocities in 1900, stating that Turner’s body was boiled and his fat extracted. In a particularly grotesque oral tradition, it was said that Black residents feared castor oil medicine, believing it might contain “Old Nat’s grease.”

These acts were not isolated or hidden—they were intended to terrorize Black Americans and obliterate any physical symbol of resistance.

While these are secondhand stories, they are valuable firsthand testimonies of the enslaved community’s perspective: they perceived the white response as not just execution but a ritual intended to terrorize. This is evidenced by William S. Drewry’s account that older Black residents expressed a lingering fear that white people had incorporated Turner’s body fat into castor oil medicines. These elders warned others to avoid such medicine for fear it contained “Old Nat’s grease.” This haunting oral tradition reveals how deeply the community understood white people’s capacity for ritual cruelty and how vividly the memory of Turner’s desecration lived on among the enslaved. White supremacist sources rarely documented these Black fears—but their silence underscores the truth enslaved elders tried to preserve.

Historically, European traditions—including old nursery rhymes like ‘Peter Peter Pumpkin Eater’ and ‘Hansel and Gretel’, as well as medieval folktales—contain themes of child-eating witches and blood rituals, suggesting that the idea of devouring a slain enemy for symbolic power is not far-fetched. Nat Turner, in the eyes of white supremacists, represented a threat so profound that he had to be physically annihilated, desecrated, and scattered.

Modern historians like Vincent Harding, Christopher Tomlins, and Vanessa Holden have affirmed that Turner’s body was destroyed intentionally to prevent martyrdom. In 2016, a skull believed to be Turner’s was returned to his family, showing that the remnants of this crucifixion still haunt America’s conscience.

The Aftermath: Retaliation, Legislation, and the “Confessions”

White backlash was swift. News of the rebellion struck terror across the South. In its immediate aftermath, over 100 Black people were killed by vigilantes and militias. General Richard Eppes eventually intervened, threatening legal action to stop extrajudicial killings.

Formal trials began August 31, 1831. Courts of oyer and terminer condemned thirty enslaved men and one free Black man to death. Nineteen were executed, and twelve received commuted sentences. In total, 56 Black people were executed in connection with the rebellion. These proceedings were held without juries and were overseen by slaveholding judges.

In 1832, Virginia responded by tightening its slave codes:

• Banning Black preaching and religious gatherings without white supervision

• Outlawing Black literacy

• Prohibiting free Black firearm ownership

• Restricting assembly of enslaved people

The rebellion briefly prompted a debate over gradual emancipation in Virginia’s legislature. Ultimately, the result was the opposite: greater repression and solidification of slavery as a protected institution, both legally and culturally.

The Enduring Spirit: Nat Turner in Modern Culture

Turner’s story resonated far beyond 1831. His rebellion intensified abolitionist fervor in the North. William Lloyd Garrison’s The Liberator began publication that same year. Turner became a martyr and a symbol of Black resistance, embraced by Civil Rights activists and the Black Power movement alike.

His legacy continues to spark artistic, literary, and scholarly engagement:

• The Confessions of Nat Turner (William Styron, 1967) — Pulitzer-winning novel, highly criticized for whitewashing Turner’s voice

• William Styron’s Nat Turner: Ten Black Writers Respond (1968) — A critical Black response to Styron

• Surviving Southampton (Vanessa Holden, 2021) — Explores the rebellion’s impact on Black women

• The Birth of a Nation (Nate Parker, 2016) — Film dramatization

• Paintings by Hale Woodruff and William H. Johnson — Powerful visual representations

• Music by Black Milk & Nat Turner (band), 2016 — Reimagining rebellion through jazz-funk

Turner is not frozen in time. He is reborn in every era of resistance—from the Civil Rights Movement to today’s Justice for Freedmen Movement—as a radical symbol of liberation, not violence. His story reminds us that real change has always come with sacrifice, defiance, and a refusal to accept injustice as destiny.

Conclusion: His Spirit Still Walks With Us

Nat Turner’s rebellion wasn’t just a moment—it was a movement. One man’s divine conviction shattered illusions of slave docility and forced a reckoning with the violence at the heart of American slavery. His unflinching resolve, framed in faith and fortified by prophecy, continues to inspire Black American Freedmen in the fight for justice, literacy, autonomy, and self-determination.

The question still echoes: Was not Christ crucified? It remains a challenge, a reminder, and a call to action.

Sources Cited:

1. Gray, Thomas R., The Confessions of Nat Turner (1831).

2. Tomlins, Christopher, In the Matter of Nat Turner: A Speculative History. Princeton University Press, 2020.

3. Holden, Vanessa M., Surviving Southampton: African American Women and Resistance in Nat Turner’s Community. University of Illinois Press, 2021.

4. Aptheker, Herbert, Nat Turner’s Slave Rebellion. International Publishers, 1937.

5. Sundquist, Eric J., To Wake the Nations: Race in the Making of American Literature. Harvard University Press, 1993.

6. Fabricant, Daniel S., “Thomas Gray and the Confessions of Nat Turner,” American Literature, 2008.

7. Richmond Enquirer, Editorials, 1831–1832.

8. Africans in America, PBS, 1998.

9. Library of Virginia Archives, Southampton Rebellion Collection.

10. Black Power and Cultural Memory Studies, University of Virginia Press, 2022.

11. Cromwell, John W., “The Aftermath of Nat Turner’s Insurrection,” The Journal of Negro History, 1920.

12. Drewry, William S., The Southampton Insurrection. Neal Publishing, 1900.

13. French, Scot, The Rebellious Slave: Nat Turner in American Memory. Houghton Mifflin, 2004.

14. “Inside the Quest to Return Nat Turner’s Skull,” National Geographic, 2016.

15. “Nat Turner’s Bible Gave the Enslaved Rebel the Resolve to Rise Up,” Smithsonian Magazine, 2016.

16. Joseph, Channing, “The Art of Being Eaten Alive,” Oxford American, 2021.